I’ve already gone over tonight. Tomorrow is the first full day of two without work and I’ve got a couple things slated, watching Newcastle United in the morning and playing hockey at night. That leaves doing taxes during the day or, more likely, grabbing some groceries.
My girlfriend was watching “The Secret” while I puttered around the web, checked my work email and tried to fill the time between the end of the Rangers game (a disappointing loss) and going to bed (as much as I enjoy sleep, a different kind of disappointment).
It’s a captivating premise, that all you have to do is believe the world is yours and so it is. Believe you’ve got money coming and there you have it. Believe you’ll get the hottest chick to lay you and, bingo, she’s in your bed. It’s easy for anyone to dismiss such a philosophy as crackpot-ism and snake-oil salesmanship, but who’s really to say that having it all isn’t just a result of knowing you’ll get what you want?
To me, it’s asinine that only Scots and Britons (and the Dutch, etc.) had the opportunity to get rich in America. By and large, they’re the one’s who did it. Inventing things, starting companies like U.S. Steel or Standard Oil. How does one have the foresight and the wherewithal to do that kind of stuff? I seriously doubt that John D. Rockefeller or Cornelius Vanderbilt had some intricate knowledge about oil and shipping and that’s how they began their businesses. I’m willing to believe they simply knew they’d be big-time and decided “I’m going to do it this way” and so struck out and did it, wooing people with their confidence and charisma into investing in their ideas and buying their products.
Confidence and charisma are the currency of all human interaction. Rich people amass their wealth through whatever variable means, and there are people getting rich all the time. It’s a cop-out to say “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer” because it’s a half-truth. Rich people are getting richer because they know how to make money and their money makes them money whether by investment or just accruing interest. Poor people either fiscally stand still or lose money because they have no idea how to better their economic situation, and some know only how to worsen it.
Back to confidence and charisma, it sells things. Anything really. Gatorade. Infomercial wares. From the top-shelf to the bottom-shelf there is psychology behind the method of sale that entices someone to buy. Those with money tend to keep toward the higher-end items and avoid the lower ones, but those without money are susceptible to all forms of coercive vending. In essence, those with high-value are secure enough to avoid being attracted to low-value merchandise while those with low-value are desperate for anything; they’ll take the lowest thing and pine for the highest.
People are still making themselves, even now … despite talk of “it’s impossible to get rich today” or “all the good ideas are already taken” … it’s just that the bulk of people are mired either in the middle or at the bottom and the negativity that festers there is infectious. It serves a main purpose of undermining the ambition of anyone who desires something greater by shattering their aspirations.
Looking back on almost every moment in my life, I have been a negative, choleric individual. It’s easy to be. It takes very little effort to loathe everything and everyone, and it’s a simple cop-out, a way to avoid trying and to placate lethargy. I’ve been told a million times that being a downer really doesn’t hurt anyone but me and those closest to me. The rest of the world wants me to be down, wants me to be miserable; it’s less competition for them or it feeds their schadenfreude to see someone stuck in a depression. Unhappy people revile the contented and the happy. It’s a cocktail of jealousy and rage. No one wants to be a miserable piece of shit, but those who can’t figure out how to be anyone else want everyone else to feel as much like garbage.
So, too, though, do those at the top want to keep down anyone without the right kind of attitude. Someone who doesn’t evince all the characteristics of go-get-em-ness is an undesirable to those with the means of including an aspirant in the culture of wealth and prominence.
As I read somewhere, it’s not about selling out so much as buying in. And, honestly, what would most people rather be: a sellout with a nice home and nice things who is confident and happy and therefore a positive, attractive force … or someone who didn’t sellout and touts their integrity while they claw through life practically destitute and perpetually desirous of more and better things while at the same time resentful of those who have “it all”.
Sometimes it really does seem like there’s a secret to life and that some folks really know what it is, while others just don’t have a clue. Take Mike Bloomberg for example: he knows nothing about computers, but computer security is how he made his fortune.
Chew on that for a while and tell me it isn’t easy if you just know how.